Thursday 4 October 2012

A new low



How do you feel?  If you are a resident, ratepayer and/or elector in the Shire of Bridgetown-Greenbushes, your Council has indicated it doesn’t give a damn what you think, or say.

In a stunning snub to both its citizens and the legislation under which it exists, our Council has thrown out recommendations sent to it by a legally constituted Special Meeting of Electors, refusing to even consider one of the meeting’s recommendations.

A new low has been reached. A point at which President Brian Moore and his ‘team’ have blatantly revealed their contempt for the people who put them into office.

The resolutions of the Electors Meeting – that Zinnecker’s House be preserved --  were tossed aside on the pretext of a ridiculous notion that because only 70 people attended the Special Meeting of Electors its outcome could not be said to represent the wishes of Bridgetown’s residents.

Hello?? What is it about democratic processes that these people fail to grasp?

By way of illustration which may enlighten them, let’s follow this warped logic for a moment… President Brian Moore’s election must be invalid, because less than half the eligible electors cast their votes. He received 873 votes, which means only 20 per cent of residents said they want him on Council.  So I make a guess the ‘silent majority’ wish he had never moved here, therefore his house should be bulldozed along with Zinnecker’s!

I am at a loss to comprehend the arrogance of a group of elected officials who chose to not even consider a resolution sent to them by a Special Meeting of Electors. The Local Government Act says that the decisions of a Electors Meeting must be “considered” at the next Council meeting. Yet, the third resolution from this meeting was not moved or discussed at the Council meeting.

This resolution called on Council, quite properly, to ask the Shire CEO to state WHO it was he spoke to at the Department of Local Government when, as he claimed, he received advice backing his assessment there was no need to rescind the existing Council decision to ‘retain’ Zinnecker’s prior to deciding to demolish it.

The people of the Shire simply sought to have the Council and its senior officer live up to its Mission Statement (“…provide ethical and open leadership…”) and Values (“Openness and accountability”).

But this Council and this CEO have now demonstrated a belief they can make their own rules and are answerable to no-one.

No comments:

Post a Comment